International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing

Mercredi 24 juin 2009 3 24 /06 /2009 06:07

Sales of new cars and light commercial vehicles in Russia continue to decrease:

• Sales of new passenger cars and LCVs in Russia decreased by 58% in May 2009 and by 47% in the first five months of 2009
 

• Among the top 10 bestselling models so far this year, seven are locally produced May 2009 saw sales of new cars and light commercial vehicles in Russia decrease by 58% compared with the same period in 2008, or by 161,524 less sold units, according to the AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee (AEB AMC)

 

Decrease for the first five months of 2009 amounted to 47% or 574,680 less sold units as compared with the same period of 2008.
Among the top ten bestselling models of passenger cars so far this year, seven are produced in Russia.

“May showed a further decline in the market of -58%, -47% for the first five months if compared with the same period last year. There are some signs that the pace of decline in the Russian market is slowing but there is still considerable variation between individual segments”, commented David THOMAS, AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee’s Chairman.

Martin JAHN, Vice Chairman of the AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee continues, “So far Government support measures have not been able to stop the decrease in sales and to change the continuing trend. We in the AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee believe that the volume of funds for the program should be increased extending the program to all locally manufactured cars, lifting the threshold of the program from 350,000 to 600,000 Roubles as soon as possible allowing a broader number of banks to operate as part of the support program.”

SOURCE: AEB May 2009 

Par Nicolas Laporte - Publié dans : International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 17 décembre 2007 1 17 /12 /2007 14:19

PRETS SUBPRIME

h-4-ill-956775-subprime-x1i1.gif

Par Nicolas Laporte - Publié dans : International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 17 décembre 2007 1 17 /12 /2007 14:08
 
 
Wielding a policy tool it last employed just after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the European Central Bank said it would work with the U.S. Federal Reserve to allow euro-zone institutions to access as much as $20 billion in extra dollar-denominated funds before year end, as turn-of-the-year tensions and fears about the depth and breadth of the bloc's subprime-related losses mount.
The Fed said yesterday it would create a new "term auction facility" under which it would lend at least $40 billion, and potentially far more, in four separate auctions starting this week. Though the loans would be at rates far below what the Fed charges on direct loans to banks from its so-called discount window, banks would still be able to use the same broad variety of collateral that they can pledge for discount-window loans.
The ECB, Bank of England, Bank of Canada and Swiss National Bank announced parallel measures. Stocks in Europe closed higher. Britain's FTSE 100 index gained 0.4% to 6559.80, the German DAX 30 index rose 0.8% to 8076.12, and the French CAC-40 index added 0.3% to 5743.32. The Dow industrials initially surged on the news but later in the day reversed course. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day up 0.3% at 13473.90.
The Swiss National Bank announced a swap line with the Fed of as much as $4 billion, while the Bank of England restricted its money-market operations to sterling but said it would increase the amount of three-month reserves auctioned to U.K. institutions in coming money-market operations and widen the range of collateral it accepts for the funds.
 Europe reaps a number of rewards from today's concerted moves. To the extent that the Fed's expanded operations help the U.S. stave off a more severe economic downturn or recession, Europe's economies will benefit from more solid stateside growth. Plus, just as the credit-market tensions erupted en force across the globe in August, many analysts believe they will not recede piecemeal: "The tensions will not disappear just in Europe," said Marco Annunziata, chief economist at UniCredit Global Research in London. "They have to disappear across the border as well."
The ECB has already undertaken moves similar to those the Fed announced yesterday, to provide euro-zone financial institutions with longer-term funds -- to little effect. Indeed, Bruce Kasman, economist at J.P. Morgan Chase, said the Fed's new lending facility "would appear to signal a shift in Fed operations towards an ECB-style operating system."
The ECB routinely conducts three-month and one-week funding operations and recently fulfilled a promise it made on Nov. 8 to auction 120 billion euros ($175.8 billion) in three-month funds before year end. On Nov. 13, the ECB also promised to provide euro-zone financial institutions with extra weekly funds through the turn of the year, which it has been doing; the bank doled out some 35 billion euros in extra funds this past Tuesday. Still, longer-term interbank lending rates in the euro area have continued to hover stubbornly around seven-year highs.
But some analysts noted the Fed's action could be a boon regardless, not least for the ECB itself. "The ECB has so far been seen as leading the pack in terms at managing this liquidity crisis, and so far the most clever at intervening in targeted ways," said Mr. Annunziata. "So it's a definitely a positive signal for the ECB because it shows that the ECB has been at the forefront while the Fed, implicitly, is following." That the Fed's actions resemble the ECB's also increases their chance of success, he said, "because there's more firepower coming on line."
Although the ECB's vice president, Lucas Papademos, contended the bank's actions weren't designed specifically to address year-end money-market tensions, analysts noted that the central banks likely harbored little hope the global swoop would return markets to normal. "I don't think they have the expectation or even the hope of normalizing the money market by just doing this," said Jose Alzola, European economist with Citigroup in London. "I think their aim is much more humble. It's just to facilitate funding around the turn of the year and avoid an escalation of the problem." The ECB's two $10 billion injections will be auctioned off on Dec. 17 and 20 and mature in early 2008.
Still, analysts took heart that the moves also left open the option of future action well into 2008. The ECB and SNB swap lines remain open for six months, which could shore up market confidence that the central banks will step in again if needed. Mr. Papademos would not comment on whether there would be further coordinated action afterward, saying only, "the necessary measures will be taken."
Euro-zone financial institutions' continuing struggles to fund dollar-denominated liabilities, such as off-balance-sheet investment vehicles, spurred the ECB's swap decision with the Fed, Mr. Papademos said. "Some financial institutions headquartered in the euro area also have needs for dollar liquidity . . . for example, to provide liquidity to off-balance-sheet investment vehicles," Mr. Papademos told reporters at a news conference.
Just such a currency mismatch, in fact, helped spark euro-zone money-market tensions on Aug. 9, as euro-zone banks scrambling for dollars to fund their dollar-denominated off-balance-sheet vehicles rapidly bought euros to convert to dollars on currency markets. That pushed euro-zone money market rates up, which prompted the ECB's initial injection of nearly 95 billion euros in overnight funds.
"This was really the origin of the problem," said Mr. Alzola. "The banks have these [structured investment vehicles, or SIVs] and conduits that have as assets mortgage-backed securities, or structures based on mortgage-backed securities, which are dollar-denominated. And when many investors refused to roll over [asset-backed commercial paper], then European banks rushed to the wholesale markets to borrow dollars."
The ECB's move lets euro-zone banks reduce the exchange-rate risk involved in funding these off-balance-sheet vehicles. It may also have been aimed at helping institutions with particularly large dollar commitments, as banks that make sudden moves to buy large amounts of dollars on currency markets could risk revealing weak spots.
"This is an additional means to help some counterparties more than others . . . more to do with size than anything else," the ECB's Mr. Papademos said, noting the ECB's continuing provision of extra euro-denominated funds. He also stressed, however, that the ECB's actions were designed to support the market as a whole: "These operations do not aim at addressing the needs of specific institutions."
In the U.S., the Fed has worried that banks' growing reluctance to lend either to other financial institutions or to businesses and consumers could dry up the flow of credit and drag the weak economy into recession.
The new term auction facility overcomes the principal obstacles the Fed has faced using its two main tools for injecting liquidity. Open-market operations can be used to inject cash at the federal-funds rate, which is relatively low, but only against a limited range of collateral. The discount window allows a broader variety of collateral, but the discount rate is half a point higher than the fed-funds rate, and banks are reluctant to access it for fear of being seen as desperate for funds.
The new loans will be auctioned off with a minimum rate linked to the expected actual fed-funds rate over the duration of the loan.
Since the federal-funds rate is expected to decline over the next two months, when the loans will be outstanding, the loan rate could end up being close to or even less than the current fed-funds rate.
"By allowing the Federal Reserve to inject term funds through a broader range of counterparties and against a broader range of collateral than open-market operations, this facility could help promote the efficient dissemination of liquidity when the unsecured interbank markets are under stress," the Fed said.
The Fed indicated that the new facility could become a permanent addition to its monetary-policy tool kit. "Experience gained under this temporary program will be helpful in assessing the potential usefulness of augmenting the Federal Reserve's current monetary policy tools -- open-market operations and the primary credit facility -- with a permanent facility for auctioning term discount-window credit." The Fed "would seek public comment on any proposal for a permanent term auction facility."
The announcement reflects months of preparation and study within the Fed on how to deal with the shortcomings it encountered in August when it lowered the discount rate in an effort to push added cash into financial markets.
Analysts speculated the coordinated move could have both practical and symbolic impact. The sudden global jolt of extra funds could help ease tensions simply by providing extra funds. In fact, in Europe, the moves' immediate impact cheered European policy makers. Three-month euro-denominated lending rates fell by some 0.20 percentage point -- from seven-year highs of around 5% -- just after the announcement, a development Mr. Papademos called "positive."
But the coordination could also tackle the problem of confidence that has been dogging markets since August. "The key issue is really restoring confidence, because providing liquidity to the markets does not help sufficiently if banks are not then willing to make the liquidity go around," said UniCredit's Mr. Annunziata. "Central banks need to provide lots of liquidity, but they also need to restore confidence. And I think seeing central banks acting together like today is going to be a big boost to confidence." Mr. Papademos stressed the ECB believes the euro-zone financial system and economy remain fundamentally sound. He noted that while some 15 euro-zone banks have disclosed third-quarter subprime-related losses, the total was less than 0.75% of their total equity.

SOURCE: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE  -- 13 Dec 07, 
               Joellen Perry, Greg Ip NORTH AMERICA / EUROPE
Par Nicolas Laporte - Publié dans : International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 3 décembre 2007 1 03 /12 /2007 17:02
 Beating down the dollar has been a popular sport lately. But the greenback may be about to get off the mat. The dollar's decline this year has been unrelenting. It has fallen 5% against the pound, 7% against the yen, 10% against the euro and 14% against the Canadian dollar. Against the U.S. Federal Reserve's broad trade-weighted basket of currencies, the dollar has fallen 8%. For years, most economists viewed the dollar as an accident waiting to happen. The burgeoning U.S. trade deficit means it is borrowing heavily from the rest of the world. The thinking was that overseas savers eventually would tire of holding ever-greater quantities of dollar-priced assets. When they were sated, the dollar would drop. And so it has. Many think it has further to go. Economists Maurice Obstfeld at the University of California at Berkeley and Kenneth Rogoff at Harvard University calculated in 2005 that with the broadest measure of the U.S. trade deficit, the current account, running above 6% of gross domestic product, the dollar needed to fall as much as 30% against the Fed's currency basket to bring the trade deficit back into balance. (A falling dollar makes U.S. exports more attractive to foreigners and makes imports pricier to Americans, shrinking the trade deficit, as has been happening lately.)
By that reckoning, the dollar needs to drop a further 20%. And the Federal Reserve's new willingness to keep cutting interest rates should, if the textbooks are right, further weaken the dollar as global investors flock to places with higher returns. But currency markets are particularly hard to forecast, and there is a case to be made that the dollar could be close to a bottom. One argument: Given the dollar's decline so far, comparing what a dollar buys in the U.S. (at U.S. prices) and abroad (at foreign prices) suggests that the dollar is actually undervalued. "You can't go to Europe and not think it's really expensive, and a European can't come to the U.S. and not think it's for sale," says Brad Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations. The organization for Economic Cooperation and Development calculates that $1 converted into euros could buy a basket of goods and services in France that would cost only 80 cents in the U.S. A dollar converted to yen would buy things that would cost 82 cents in the U.S. Over time, markets are expected to narrow such gaps by pushing up the dollar and pulling down the euro and yen. Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill says that by this measure, the dollar hasn't been this undervalued against major currencies since 1995. "You don't get these degrees of misalignment for long," he says. What's more, the dollar's weakness largely reflects a forecast that the U.S. economy will slow substantially while the rest of the world perks up. Such divergence tends to weaken the dollar by making the U.S. a less attractive destination for investors and to breed expectations of lower U.S. interest rates. It is one reason U.S. stocks have been among the worst performers on world stock markets so far this year. In October, the International Monetary Fund estimated that the U.S. economy would grow 1.9%, while all "advanced economies" would grow 2.9%. That would make this the first year the U.S. economy has grown more slowly than its peers since 2001. Since then, the headwinds to the economy have gotten stiffer, but global investors remain remarkably sanguine about the global outlook, believing that other countries' economic dependence on the U.S. has diminished, a theory yet to be tested. "To say that the rest of the world is immune to the U.S. slowdown is premature," says Robert Sinche, head of global foreign-exchange strategy at Bank of America. The euro's strength against the dollar is in itself hurting European exporters' ability to compete globally, and that is an impediment to European growth, says Mr. Sinche. In November, the chief executive of European aircraft maker Airbus, Tom Enders, called the dollar's decline "life threatening." There are plenty of signs that the U.S. won't go down alone. The U.K. economy has slowed so much that the Bank of England is at least thinking about cutting rates. Retail sales in Japan are soft. And the Canadian dollar dipped for a while below parity with the U.S. on Friday amid falling oil prices and talk of an interest-rate cut there. The U.S. dollar ended up buying 99.87 Canadian cents. If economies outside the U.S. slow, the U.S. may no longer seem like such a bad place for foreign investors to put their money, especially given how much further a euro or yen will go in the U.S. than they do at home. That could restrain the dollar's fall. More immediately, troubled U.S. financial firms may need to sell foreign-currency-denominated assets to shore up their balance sheets before they close their books at year end. Repatriating that money will mean buying dollars, and that could boost the currency. Meantime, hedge funds and other speculative investors have placed heavy bets on the dollar's continuing to lose ground against other currencies. If the dollar starts to rise, they will be forced to unwind those bets, and the dollar's rebound could be fierce.

 SOURCE: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE, Justin Lahart USA / EUROPE -- 3 Dec 07
 
Par Nicolas Laporte - Publié dans : International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 19 novembre 2007 1 19 /11 /2007 14:27

The plunging dollar has sent inflation alarm bells clanging across the U.S. But they may be false alarms. A battery of research has been building over the years that the dollar doesn't drive U.S. inflation like it used to. A key reason: Foreign exporters are so keen to keep U.S. market share that when the dollar weakens, they often lower their prices to keep them constant after the currency effect. That's especially true when the economy is slowing and consumers are less willing to pay higher prices. A 10% decline in the value of the dollar -- the drop seen over the last year -- might be expected to raise the price of imports by 10%. But the actual pass-through is a fraction of that. Studies have found that only one-quarter to one-tenth of a currency depreciation gets passed through as higher prices for imported products. That makes the U.S. Federal Reserve's job a bit easier during uncertain times. If the economy slows sharply, the Fed can lower interest rates -- a move that tends to weaken the dollar even more -- to boost the economy without worrying as much about inflation. Last month, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said that while a dollar depreciation leads to "some inflationary effect" as imports' costs rise, "our experience over the recent decade has been that those effects are relatively small." The Fed's job is to balance growth and inflation, and few economists believe the central bank should act simply to preserve the dollar's value. Moreover, for Fed policy makers, the weak dollar has been a timely benefit: It is boosting U.S. exports, which helps ease the pain of a severe housing downturn and credit crunch. "Right now, they're going to view this as good, not bad," said Brandeis University professor Stephen Cecchetti. "There are no tangible inflation risks that are coming out of it." Markets seem to agree. The dollar's five-year decline hasn't raised inflation expectations, as expressed by the bond market. Prices of gold, oil and other commodities have surged, but much of the cause has been growing demand and speculation in financial markets. A recent study by Fed staffers found that the U.S. consumer got special treatment from companies sending goods into the country -- they have been more willing to accept thinner margins, especially since 2002. They didn't give as much latitude to other countries, reflecting the dollar's international dominance and concerns about losing ground in a key market. Even if the weak dollar has only a modest impact on inflation, there are other risks. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, has remained tame in recent months, within the 1%-to-2% comfort zone for some Fed officials. But the dollar's decline could boost the public's expectation of future inflation, creating a self-fulfilling effect that pushes prices higher. The dollar decline can create a communications problem for Fed officials, whose policy decisions aren't directed toward the dollar but may nevertheless depress the currency. "It sets the market backdrop which your policy actions will be interpreted against," said Vincent Reinhart, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and former head of the Fed's monetary-affairs division. "People might get confused as to why exactly you're easing policy." The declining dollar used to have a bigger impact on import prices. From the mid-1970s through the 1990s, the pass-through rate was as high as 50% -- meaning a 10% drop in the dollar would raise import prices by 5%. This decade the pass-through rate has been less than 25%. For the overall economy, that's still a small increase because imports are a fraction of the goods consumed. Of the roughly $2 trillion of goods imported by the U.S. last year, more than one-third came from Asia. Compared with the euro, Asian currencies have remained far more stable against the dollar, partly because some countries, such as China, manage their currencies to hold down their value.

In addition, in many cases, importers' costs for cheaper goods from China are just a fraction of the ultimate prices charged U.S. consumers, due to markups. The companies bringing goods into the U.S. have the choice of "eating it in their margin or jacking up their price when the exchange rate moves," Mr. Cecchetti at Brandeis said. How a falling dollar affects imports can depend on the specific product: The prices of some luxury imports, such as BMW vehicles, have stayed steady as manufacturers accept lower profits. Airlines, however, operate on thinner margins and are quicker to raise ticket prices if their costs rise. In addition, price increases in raw materials, including steel and other commodities, tend to pass through at much higher rates -- 90% or more -- in part because they are priced globally and hit firms equally. Some economists question how long companies will accept weaker profits. "If oil continues on its path . . . we're going to see more pass-through from oil than we've seen before, says Joel Popkin, an economist who analyzes price trends for his own company. "You're starting to get to the point where the costs can't be absorbed." Other economists are keeping a sharp eye out for dollar-induced inflation, even as they note that their economic models suggest little reason to worry. "We're not blind to the risk that something may have changed," said Lehman Brothers economist Drew Matus. "You can never really tell the regime shifts until it's too late." 


Source: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE, Sudeep Reddy USA
-- 19 Nov 07, 

Par From Internet - Publié dans : International Finance -- Exchange Rate / Financing
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander

Profil

  • : Nicolas Laporte
  • : 03/08/1971

Présentation

  • : Le blog de Nicolas Laporte
  • : Site perso de Nicolas LAPORTE. Actualité du secteur automobile en Russie. Automotive business news in Russia.
  • Retour à la page d'accueil
  • Contact

View Nicolas Laporte's profile on LinkedIn
nicolas laporte

Recommander

Rechercher

Créer un blog sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Signaler un abus